Showing posts with label symposium. Show all posts
Showing posts with label symposium. Show all posts

Saturday, December 29, 2018

No Place for Us in Chennai - A Symposium: Report


No Place for Us in Chennai - A Symposium Report





As part of the 2018 Prajnya 16 days Campaign against Gender Violence, in partnership with Penn Thozhilalar Sangam, we organised a half-day symposium on the gendered impact of forced evictions at Asha Nivas Chennai on November 30th 2018.

Forced evictions are defined by the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights as “the involuntary removal of persons from their homes or land, directly or indirectly attributable to the State. It entails the effective elimination of the possibility of an individual or group living in a particular house, residence or place, and the assisted (in the case of resettlement) or unassisted (without resettlement) movement of evicted persons or groups to other areas.”

Governments in a hurry to check off contemporary development indicators sanction public and private sector projects that too often require the vacation of land where people live and which they may also use for subsistence farming. This land is acquired for a variety of purposes with one major consequence: displacement. It is also acquired either without the consent of its residents or with such minimal consultation and compensation that they are left with little or nothing.

Forced evictions contribute significantly to the feminization of poverty and displacement, and alongside that, a host of negative consequences for women and girls. By extension, they also impact others genders in particular ways.

The objective of this half-day symposium was:

  • To raise awareness about forced evictions as a gender equality problem;
  • To provide a platform for those whose work engages with this issue directly or peripherally to share their perspectives; and,
  • To challenge this predatory model of development that depends on the disruption and destruction of lives and community, highlighting alternative paths.

The first session of the symposium was kickstarted by Ms Satyarupa Shekhar from Citizen Consumer and CivicAction Group whose presentation 'Invisible Impacts' covered the Smart City model, throwing light into the monitoring of smart cities mission. Satyarupa’s presentation highlighted the successes of the smart city mission as well as the drawbacks. She pointed out areas in which smart city mission has overlooked the consequences of evictions and vulnerabilities of slum communities. Her presentation also covered the assessment of flood risks in Chennai especially the high-risk slum communities.


Post this informative presentation, the PTS members from evicted communities took to the floor to talk about their problems.

Around 20 members from Penn Thozhilalar Sangam turned up for the symposium from the evicted communities of Gudapakkam, Morai, and Perumbakkam. Each community representative listed their problems which included the lack of basic facilities like drinking water, difficulty to access resources like the grocery store, school, hospital. Lack of proper lighting and drainage, a common problem across all communities. Women who earlier had street vendor jobs were forced to quit due to the deserted nature of their relocated area and have to return home early due to safety issues. More complaints were raised against the government and housing secretary who promised them land in exchange for eviction but nothing materialised out of it.


This community experience session was followed by Ms Vanessa Peter’s presentation where she talked about her research with evicted communities. The communities evicted from Cooum area who were relocated to township style accommodations in the outskirts of the city continue to live the facade. The reality shows lack of school, toilets, leaking roofs and no proper action from the government. In addition to these physical problems, lack of safety for women and young girls remain a major problem in these areas and the reason why a majority of the women stay home and make their daughters quit school as well.

This session was followed by an open forum discussion with Ms Katheeja Talha an architect who shared her experiences of working with slum and evicted communities. She shared best practices and ideas she had learnt from her work to guide these evicted community members to find a better solution for their woes.

At the end of the event, Chennai Housing Secretary Mr S. Krishnan IAS participated in the discussion and spent some quality time listening to the problems and issues of the community members. He noted down the complaints and assured immediate action.




Note: A special thanks to Mr S. Krishnan for taking time off his busy schedule to attend our event and participate in the discussion.

No Recourse - A Symposium: Report

No Recourse - A Symposium Report
As part of the 2018 Prajnya 16 days Campaign against Gender violence in partnership with Friedrich Ebert Stiftung we organised No Recourse - A Symposium on Workplace Safety and Rights for Women Workers in the Informal and Unorganised Sectors on November 27th 2018 at ICSA Egmore. The objective of this day-long symposium was to bring together the spectrum of women workers’ experiences and challenges in accessing a safe work environment, notwithstanding the provisions of the law. It was designed as a day for sharing and learning, with a view to acquiring a clear understanding of pressing problems and preferred solutions.
The symposium was scheduled to have two sessions before lunch on the challenges faced by the women workers in the informal sector including street vendors, domestic workers, construction workers and garment sector workers. Post-lunch a brainstorming panel was scheduled to discuss the solutions and way forward. Due to the late arrival of the speakers, the morning session was adapted as open floor session where women were given 10 minutes and men were given 5 minutes to talk about their perspective on the issue.

First Session: Challenges faced by Women Working in Unorganised Sectors

Mr Maheshwaran the State Secretary of National Association of Street Vendors of India, opened the session by talking about the widows and destitute women who work as street vendors to make a living but are met with police atrocities every day. The police sexually and verbally abuse these women but nobody questions this illegal police harassment. He then narrated a story of a woman who was arrested under false prostitution case and who was later proved innocent by the union.
Dr Catherine Bansi, State Treasurer of NASVI added to Maheshwaran’s brief by talking about the organisational support in terms of entrepreneurship training given by NASVI to destitute women.
Muthulakshmi, another member of NASVI in her talk listed the challenges women street vendors face like unavailability of toilet facilities, police abuse in terms of expecting bribe or confiscation of goods. The city corporation also turns a deaf ear to the street vendors as proper permissions are not sanctioned.
Post this, Ms Sujata Mody, President of Penn Thozhilalar Sangam spoke about how 'The Committee on Status of Women' by Dr Vina Majumdar called "Towards Equality" in 1970 set the women movement in momentum. Sujata gave a brief rundown of the past and the present status of the women working in unorganized sectors stressing on the point that this unorganised work done by women is yet to be recognised as work. She insisted on the unions coming together and working towards establishing a framework as there are enough laws and policies to protect the unorganised workers but the lack of a framework on how to access it remains a hurdle.

Ms Puspa a domestic worker and a member of the National Domestic Workers’ Movement narrated her experience as a domestic worker and the problems she faces. Her main concern was job insecurity as domestic workers are known to be dismissed if they raise questions. The employees never give them a job description and keep adding to the work, but the wages do not match the work extracted from them. Another interesting point she made was the availability of low wage labourers who come from other states thus raising the competition.
Sister Valarmathi who is the state coordinator of National Domestic Workers’ Movement spoke about the activism work done by NDWM to get domestic workers their due recognition. Domestic work is not recognised as a profession due to the stigma associated with it but it is overlooked that domestic workers contribute to the country’s economy because many families cannot go to work if the domestic worker doesn’t contribute.
This stigma surrounding domestic workers is the reason behind these women facing sexual abuse. She talked about a girl in Virudhunagar who was sexually abused and murdered but as there are no witnesses inside a house, no proper action was taken. She gave a couple of more examples of the kind of harassment domestic workers face, like the case where a webcam was kept inside the bathroom where the domestic worker takes bath and she was blackmailed with the recorded video. There was a girl who had worked at a house for five years but just because she didn’t take proper care of the dog hot water was poured on her.
Sister Valarmathi said when the Sexual Harassment Bill was drafted, unorganized sectors were not included and later it was included due to the efforts of many activists and organisations. Minimum wage recognition is another ongoing battle. Rs. 75 for one hour is the minimum wage demanded by many associations but only Rs. 35 is recognized as the minimum wage. Another point she made was about International Labour Organization convention not ratified by the Government of India whereas if it were ratified it would benefit the unorganized sector workers.

Ms Renuka, founder of the Center for Women’s Development and Research focused on the lack of regulations in cases of sexual harassment faced by domestic workers. There is no Internal Complaints Committee and if the women report the sexual violence they will be blamed with theft and dismissed or worse get arrested. Another main point she made was that domestic workers should be included in the realm of #MeToo which is currently elitist.
Following this, women continued to come up to talk about their challenges and problems. One of the PTS members from the garment sector said how women are generally perceived as biologically weak and hence treated inferior. She talked about Penn Thozhilalar Sangam’s seven cases in the high court against sexual harassment in the garment sector.
Another domestic worker, Sheela, made a point that domestic workers don’t get systematic leaves thus leaving them with no time to spend with their families. One of the PTS members narrated a story of a 40-year-old woman who faced sexual abuse from her supervisor but didn’t want to file a complaint because she was scared of social stigma. When PTS dealt with the case the victim was transferred but her abuser continues to work at the same place. The garment employees face abuse at all levels said one of the PTS member, even complaints to the supervisor and HR doesn’t work. If such cases are reported to even Director he or she asks the employee to adjust.
Sister Valarmathi of Tamil Nadu Domestic Worker Association talked about labourers who go abroad for job depend on the agents who send them abroad. These agents sell domestic workers to the customers abroad and the workers are not given enough information about the salary, laws etc. The auction of domestic workers also happen and the auction rates are fixed depending on their complexion, beauty etc. These agents also sexually abuse them. Once they reach the other country, they will be locked in the apartment. They will be isolated so as to not let them approach the embassy and sometimes are forced to commit suicide. NDWM has demanded to set up a Rescue Committee but there is no step taken yet. They have also stressed that MOU between the two countries where the workers go for work and grievances cell should be formed.
The Way Forward
Post-lunch, the speakers and participants sat together to discuss the way forward. Ms Geetha Narayanan listed down areas to look into:
  • The countries should allocate more funds for social protection such as Health, Education etc;
  • As we all sell the land and water to the corporates there is no security circle for us.
  • At the WTO level, we should demand to stop online commercial platform and open up channels for small farmers and vendors' to sell their commodities;
  • We should bring awareness to the women about the Local Compliance Committee;
  • #Metoo should bring solidarity among all of us. 

Ms  Selvi, an advocate at Chennai High Court said:
  • Definition of Workplace should be broadened;
  • The ICC set up should also be strengthened in all workplaces;
  • Need to have a dialogue with the government and their accountability should be taken up seriously. There are many laws but there is no accountability;
  • #Metoo should catch up and expand enough to include more women;
  • Documentation should be necessary to approach the government, it will help challenge the government.

Areas of Improvement
The speakers and participants took part in a discussion where they decided on the following points as the areas to work on and improve:
  • Taking forward and creating a similar platform in the villages (awareness in the villages).
  • Documenting the experiences of women through the survey.
  • This meeting should be the seed for the future campaigning of Economic Justice and Gender Justice together.
  • Stigma related to the unorganized and informal sectors among the women workers need to be removed.
  • All basic needs such as Bus passes for the informal and unorganized women workers have to be met.
  • Campaigning such as #MeToo has to be brought down to the women of these sectors.
  • Memes can be positively portrayed in such a way to capture the related laws.
  • Life Skill training to girls on "How to say No?"
  • Tagging the related women organisation with the issues shared in the social media.
  • Shooting short movies related to the issues and laws.
  • Wall paintings about the Violence Against Women all over the public spaces.
  • Should be branched out to include more people into the stream.
  • Getting slot in the visual media exclusive for Women Trade Unions.
  • Having a digital Directory of the women organizations 
  • Making short video teaching modules on laws and made viral
  • Litigation to question the ways to utilize the unutilized Nirbhaya Fund.
  • Teach the children how to stand against the harassment boldly.

Future Agenda
  • Campaign once in three months by Sujata Mody
  • Law Literacy programmes by Advocate Selvi
  • Survey of the women worker's experiences by Sister Clara.
  • The area of work should be focussed - not generally VAW but Violence against Working Women
  • Formation of Working Group: Members are Muthulakshmi, Geetha Narayanan, Sister Clara, Renuka, Advocate Selvi, Sujata Mody, Sudaroli, Hemalatha.
  • We can work on one component once in three months

Ms Damyanty Sridharan of Friedrich Ebert Stiftung delivered the valedictory note in which she mentioned FES’s effort to include Gender as one of the agenda in all their programmes. She suggested that more men should be involved in the Gender Justice related conversations. Though we work on women issues, we should have discussions about other issues with various stakeholders to broaden our perspectives and knowledge in order to achieve Gender Justice.




Monday, December 3, 2018

Day 6: No Place for Us in Chennai: A symposium on the gendered impact of forced evictions


Governments in a hurry to check off contemporary development indicators sanction public and private sector projects that too often require the vacation of land where people live and which they may also use for subsistence farming. This land is acquired for a variety of purposes with one major consequence: displacement. 

Forced evictions contribute significantly to the feminization of poverty and displacement, and alongside that, a host of negative consequences for women and girls. By extension, they also impact others genders in particular ways. 


Penn Thozhillar Sangam (PTS) has been a crusader for the rights of many evicted communities in Chennai. Prajnya and PTS came together to organise this half-day symposium to address the gendered impact of forced evictions. 

The invited speakers for the symposium were Satyarupa Shekhar, CAG; Vanessa Peter, a policy researcher, Geetha, a lawyer; Katheeja Talha, an architect; Ranjitha Gunasekharan, assistant editor New Indian Express, Sangeetha, PTS secretary and PTS members from evicted communities living in Gudapakkam, Perumbakkam, and Morai. The Chennai Housing Secretary S. Krishnan IAS was also invited to join the open discussion and give valedictory remarks. 

While Geetha and Ranjitha couldn't attend the event due to personal reasons, the event proceeded as planned. Following an interesting presentation by Satyarupa Shekhar on smart cities, the PTS members took to the floor to share their grievances. Following the session on community experiences, Vanessa Peter's talk summarised the problems faced by these communities. The next session was an open forum facilitated by Katheeja Talha and Sujata Mody. At the end of the session, housing secretary, S. Krishnan IAS, joined the discussion and heard the complaints and suggestions of the community people. 

The session ended on a high note with mutual appreciation shown by the housing secretary and Prajnya and PTS. 


Women's Christian College English department students rapporteured the programme and a detailed report of the programme will be added to this post. 



Monday, December 10, 2012

Day 16 -- Outlawing gender violence

For the last day, Prajnya organized a symposium, Outlawing Gender Violence, for legal professionals and students. Sexual Harassment, Sexual Assault and Violence and Domestic Violence were some of the key issues that were discussed.

The morning started off with a session on Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) and gender violence. Ms. Geeta Ramaseshan gave a background about the international agreement adopted in 1979 by the UN General Assembly. Countries that are part of the convention have committed to submit national reports on measures they have taken to comply with their treaty obligations. NGOs and women organizations send shadow reports to CEDAW on the ground realities. 

The second session focused on Indian laws relating to gender violence. The panel was composed of Ms. Vidya Chetan, Ms. K. Santhakumari and Ms. Sheila Jayaprakash. Ms. K. Santhakumari gave a history behind the crafting of the law on rape and sexual assault.  She touched on each type of assault and spoke about the drawbacks and deficiencies in the law especially in regards to marital rape. Ms. Sheila Jayaprakash talked about workplace sexual harassment. She touched upon the history that led to the Vishaka guidelines and talked about how companies should craft their sexual harassment policies. Ms. Vidya Chetan spoke about the Domestic Violence Act. 

After the presentation, participants broke out into three different groups where they got to sit with one of the lawyers and hear their expertise. The questions were varied and touched on a gamut of issues --- with regards to sexual abuse of children, what are the remedies available to victims? Can third-parties report incidents of sexual abuse of minors?; if a victim were to conceive because of a rape, what happens?; Are there women in supreme court?; What is the difference between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and sexual harassment policies?; If a man is wrongfully implicated as a perpetrator, what happens?

The third session focused on gender violence laws around the world. Ms. NV Sreejaya talked about the laws in the United Kingdom especially in regards to domestic violence and whether or not they have succeeded. Mr. Daniel Lee from the U.S. Consulate gave an overview of the American law. He touched briefly on domestic violence, workplace sexual harassment, hate crimes and same-sex marriages. Mr. Philipp Oliver Gross from the EU Delegation to India spoke about the European Union (EU) and violence against women. He said the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights was working on a survey across all 27 member states to measure the frequency and severity of violence against women in EU and the first survey results will be presented in 2013. 

A big thank you to the all presenters who shared their expertise and valuable time.

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Day 4 -- a symposium on Mental Health and Gender Violence

In partnership with the Schizophrenia Research Foundation (SCARF - www.scarfindia.org), a symposium was held on Mental Health and Gender Violence. About 150 students and professionals from the fields of psychology, social work and counseling attended the seminar. The chairperson for the seminar was Dr. Sheela Julius, Head of the Department of Counseling Psychology from the Madras School of Social Work.

Participants were given a warm welcome from Dr. R. Thara, director of SCARF and Dr. Swarna from Prajnya.

The programme kicked off with Gender Violence – getting the basics right, a session by Anupama from Prajnya. She noted that violence is like the elephant in the room that everyone is trying to ignore and talked about the stigma and the challenges in addressing gender violence. She encouraged the young students to separate their professional assessment from their personal feelings. “We must go so far but if for whatever reason they refuse our help, we must not sit in judgement.”

The next session, “Violence at Home – Detection and Management”, was conducted by Dr. Shuba Kumar. She is a social scientist and co-founder of Samarth, a NGO that focuses on health research and training. In the seminar, she talked about the findings of her research study, Domestic violence and its mental health correlates in Indian women. The findings were published in the British Journal of Psychiatry. http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/187/1/62.short The study sample included about 10,000 women across various strata in seven different centres across India and the findings on the correlation between domestic violence and poor mental health was reviewed for the Domestic Violence Act (2005). The study provided substantive evidence of the need to classify domestic violence as a major health problem.

The third session, Mental Health correlates of violence, was conducted by Dr. Hema Tharoor, a psychiatrist at SCARF. She is a recipient of the Dr. TMA Pai Gold medal for Excellence in Medical Research and has extensive investigative experience in clinical drug trials. Dr. Hema talked about health and mental disorders arising from witnessing domestic violence. She gave an example of a student refusing to attend school because the child was a witness to bullying. Witnessing violence as a child can lead to trust issues and impair romantic relationship and emotional attachments. She said “violence was impossible to predict but risk can be assessed” and discussed vulnerabilities that might pre-dispose individuals to violence.

The final session, Counseling victims of violence, was conducted by psychotherapist Ravi Samuel, who has over 19 years of clinical experience. Mr Samuel is an external faculty member at the Institute for Psychotherapy & Management Sciences, Chennai and is an associate member of the Indian Psychiatric Society. He started the session by narrating two cases and asked the audience for their observations and impressions. He advised that counselors should not make assumptions without finding the complete history and to get an informed view. He said, “Violence is only one part of the relationship.... We need to know the relationship dynamics to aid the counseling process.” Counselors' own ideologies about violence will shape and impact the treatment paths, he noted and advised to not give common sense advice to patients. “Go beyond the violence to bring permanent solutions.”